Talk:Chinese economic reform

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chinese economic reform article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

Chinese economic reform was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 20, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed

China Top‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by .

Chinese economic miracle?

Compared to other "miracles" in Category:Economic booms, surely the Chinese economy boom could be elevated from "reform" to "miracle"? Bennylin (talk)

Requested move 16 February 2025

It has been proposed in this section that Chinese economic reform be renamed and moved to Reform and Opening Up.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Chinese economic reform → Reform and Opening Up – Reform and Opening Up is far more precise and descriptive. "Chinese economic reform" could refer to any number of moments in Chinese economic history, or even all of them. JArthur1984 (talk) 13:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@The Account 2 moved the page to Reform and Opening Up. Reform and Opening Up is an obviously better, more precise, title.

Another editor reverted it as an undiscussed move, giving no additional rationale.

I propose we move it back to Reform and Opening Up.

JArthur1984 (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support the rationale for the move to Reform and Opening Up makes a lot of sense, the reversal makes little sense unless it is explained. OrientalTraveller (talk) 03:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support as the person who originally moved the page. @JArthur1984:, maybe you can start a WP:RSPM to move this page. The Account 2 (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]